Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Lyles v. Indiana
513 U.S. 1130
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1995-01-23
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- “a party who fails to object to a jury instruction at trial may not later raise the issue”
- no actual prejudice from introduction of inadmissible hearsay regarding petitioner’s intent where petitioner found not guilty of first-degree murder
- question of merger should be resolved before rendering a conclusion as to whether the total sentence constituted cruel and unusual punishment
- "we reject [the] contention that [the child's] out-of-court statements... are per se unreliable, or at least presumptively unreliable, on the ground that the trial court found [the child] incompetent to testify at trial"
- the natural consequence of repeatedly kicking the victim in the head while he was on the floor bleeding is to cause serious physical injury; the evidence was sufficient, therefore, for a jury to find that the defendant attempted to kill or cause, serious physical injury
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Lyles v. Indiana. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 48 opinions
Ct. App. Ind. Certiorari denied.