Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Lummi Indian Tribe v. Washington

507 U.S. 1051

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1993-04-26
Topic
general

holding that the filing of a claim waives the right to jury trial and an Article III judge. | denying writ of mandamus because it was not clear and indisputable that petitioner was entitled to jury trial | denying writ of mandamus because it was not clear and indisputable that petitioner was entitled to jury trial | creditor that files a contingent claim specifically reserving right to jury trial has submitted to bankruptcy court’s equitable jurisdiction | we can affirm the district court on any basis supported by the record, even if the district court did not rely on that basis | creditor who has filed a contingent claim couched in “protective language” still “has submitted to the bankruptcy court’s equitable jurisdiction and waived any Seventh Amendment right to a jury trial.” | Criminal District Attorney of Bexar County | Criminal District Attorney of Bexar County | denial of motion for reconsideration | denial of motion for reconsideration

Citator

Cited by
42 opinions

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.