Love v. United States

holding that counsel’s decision not to pursue additional psychological testing was within reasonable professional judgment, after initial tests revealed no mitigating psychiatric conditions | concluding that questions regarding expert's conclusions are for jury | Court has not extended Ake but test is whether defendant was denied basic tools of defense | consolidation of charges not the subject of assignment of error not considered in passion and prejudice review | “We have previously recognized that the Virginia Supreme Court has thus provided a constitutionally limited construction of its vileness aggravating factor” | defendant found to have murdered victim to avoid arrest for rape | defendant found to have murdered victim to avoid arrest for rape | defendant sodomized child victim and used stun gun on victim's penis | defendant sodomized child victim and used stun gun on victim's penis | Ake not extended, defendant did not show need for expert