Loudoun Times-Mirror v. Arctic Co.

determination that evidence was insufficient to sustain charge of first degree murder after presentation of some, but not all, of state’s case-in-chief held unappealable | determination that evidence was insufficient to sustain charge of first degree murder after presentation of some, but not all, of state's case-in-chief held unappealable | “even a remote risk, that the witness will be prosecuted for the criminal activities that Ms testimony might touch on,” is sufficient to sustain a privilege claim | where court noted that a consultant to a governmental entity could be a public official subject to the Sullivan test | court finds implied right of action under § 13(d) of the Act | Sections 13(d) and 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act | government consultant not a public figure