Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Lindell v. United States
496 U.S. 926
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1990-06-11
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- rule of reason considers “agreements whose competitive effect can only be evaluated by analyzing the facts peculiar to the business involved, the particular restraint’s history, and the reasons it was imposed”
- “In order to prove an abridgment of the sixth amendment right to effective assistance of counsel based on an allegedly wrongful denial of a continuance, a defendant must first demonstrate that the district court ‘abused its discretion’ in denying the motion.”
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Lindell v. United States. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 70 opinions
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.