Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Lindell v. United States

496 U.S. 926

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1990-06-11
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • rule of reason considers “agreements whose competitive effect can only be evaluated by analyzing the facts peculiar to the business involved, the particular restraint’s history, and the reasons it was imposed”
  • “In order to prove an abridgment of the sixth amendment right to effective assistance of counsel based on an allegedly wrongful denial of a continuance, a defendant must first demonstrate that the district court ‘abused its discretion’ in denying the motion.”

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Lindell v. United States. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
70 opinions

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.