Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Liggett & Myers Tobacco Co. v. South Carolina

Liggett & Myers Tobacco Co. v. S.C., 291 U.S. 652 (1934)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1934-03-19
Topic
general

Per Curiam: The motion of the appellee to dismiss the appeal herein is granted, and the appeal is dismissed for the reason that the judgment of the Supreme Court of the State of South Carolina, insofar as the appellant seeks here to review it, was based upon a non-federal ground adequate to support it. Quong Ham Wah Co. v. Industrial Comm’n, 255 U.S. 445, 448, 449; Knights of Pythias v. Meyer, 265 U.S. 30, 32, 33; Swiss Oil Corp. v. Shanks, 273 U.S. 392, 411, 412; Hicklin v.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Liggett & Myers Tobacco Co. v. South Carolina. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
1 opinion
Per Curiam:

The motion of the appellee to dismiss the appeal herein is granted, and the appeal is dismissed for the reason that the judgment of the Supreme Court of the State of South Carolina, insofar as the appellant seeks here to review it, was based upon a non-federal ground adequate to support it. Quong Ham Wah Co. v. Industrial Comm’n, 255 U.S. 445, 448, 449; Knights of Pythias v. Meyer, 265 U.S. 30, 32, 33; Swiss Oil Corp. v. Shanks, 273 U.S. 392, 411, 412; Hicklin v. Coney, 290 U.S. 169, 171; Live Oak Water Users Assn. v. Railroad Comm’n, 269 U.S. 354, 359; Girard Trust Co. v. Ocean & Lake Realty Co., 286 U.S. 523; Real Estate-Land Title & Trust Co. v. Springfield, 287 U.S. 577.