Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Levine v. Busick
414 U.S. 1106
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1973-12-17
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- allowing prejudgment interest for future damages and observing that for both past and future damages "the defendant has had the use, and the plaintiff has not, of moneys which the judgment finds was the damage plaintiff suffered”
- involving the validity of Rule 4:42-11(b), which authorizes] prejudgment interest in tort actions
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Levine v. Busick. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 62 opinions
Appeal from Sup. Ct. N. J. dismissed for want of substantial federal question.