Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Lemmon v. Robertson
375 U.S. 5
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1963-10-14
- Topic
- labor-and-employment
How later courts describe this case
- motion for injunction or protective order, while not appealable because equivalent to motion to quash, is within district court’s supervisory jurisdiction
- “The Supreme Court scarcely intended that the important policy pronouncements in Cobbledick and Di Bella could be side-stepped by baptizing ... a motion to suppress as one for an injunction restraining the use of evidence and mandating its return.... ”
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Lemmon v. Robertson. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 25 opinions
Per Curiam.
The motion of appellees, Lewis Woodard and May Woodard, for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.