Leeke v. Gordon

recognizing that even where a pro se claim is insufficient in substance, it may be scrutinized and amended to achieve the ends of justice | finding that pro se complaints should be construed liberally | finding that pro se complaints should be construed liberally | only the affiant’s economic condition may be considered in determining whether to grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis | only the affiant's economic condition may be considered in determining whether to grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis | pro se civil rights plaintiff should be granted leave to amend complaint despite failure to state how he could cure deficiencies | district court should appoint counsel to assist a pro se litigant who raises a colorable claim but lacks the capacity to present it | pro se civil rights plaintiff should be granted leave to amend complaint despite failure to state how he could cure deficiencies | reckless conduct sufficient to satisfy scienter requirement in securities context | court’s duty is to interpret pro se complaints liberally | court's duty is to interpret pro se complaints liberally | courts should liberally construe pro se complaint | courts must liberally construe pro se complaints