Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Leady v. United States

Leady v. United States, 99 L. Ed. 2d 484 (1988)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1988-03-28
Topic
general

paraphrasing Wolff to include among prisoner’s due process rights “the opportunity to appear at the hearing” | finding no violation of § 1983 where hearing officer refused to interview inmate victim at disciplinary hearing of his attacker based upon officer’s concern of potential retaliation against witness | finding no violation of Sec. 1983 where hearing officer refused to interview inmate victim at disciplinary hearing of his attacker based upon officer's concern of potential retaliation against witness | allegation that false evidence was planted by a prison guard does not state a constitutional claim where procedural due process protections are provided | where prison superintendent testified that inmate/victim who was assaulted by plaintiff did not testify at plaintiff’s disciplinary hearing to protect victim from retaliation, disciplinary hearing did not violate procedural due process | “inmate grievance procedures are not required by the Constitution and therefore a violation of such procedures does not give rise to a claim under § 1983”

Citator

Cited by
26 opinions

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.