Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Lambright v. Arizona

105 S. Ct. 268

Type: Opinion
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1984-10-09
Topic: general

Victim’s body would have been recovered regardless of the information furnished by defendant’s second oral statement | if any evidence establishes guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, and if the trier of fact believes that evidence, reversal based on sufficiency of the evidence is improper | if any evidence establishes guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, and if the trier of fact believes that evidence, reversal based on sufficiency of the evidence is improper

Citator

Cited by: 69 opinions

*892 Sup. Ct. Ariz.;

Sup. Ct. Cal.;

Ct. Crim. App. Tex.;

Ct. Crim. App. Tenn.;

Sup. Ct. Fla.;

Sup. Ct. Ill.;

*893 No. 84-5261. No. 84-5265. No. 84-5269. No. 84-5505.

Sup. Ct. Ky.;

Sup. Ct. Mo.;

Sup. Ct. Fla.; and

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: No. 83-6704, 138 Ariz. 63, 673 P. 2d 1; No. 83-7013, 35 Cal. 3d 329, 673 P. 2d 680; No. 83-7014, 667 S. W. 2d 137; No. 84-5200, 450 So. 2d 208; No. 84-5206, 102 Ill. 2d 54, 464 N. E. 2d 206; No. 84-5261, 669 S. W. 2d 519; No. 84-5265, 673 S. W. 2d 1; No. 84-5269, 449 So. 2d 253; No. 84-5505, 742 F. 2d 155.