Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Lake Nacimiento Ranch Co. v. County of San Luis Obispo

102 L. Ed. 2d 55

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1988-10-03
Topic
general

noting that the district court properly required nonmovant to make "sufficient showings" supporting essential elements of its case | noting that the district court properly required nonmovant to make “sufficient showings” supporting essential elements of its case | finding the submission of an "informal" draft of a development plan for comments by land use agency staff members was not a meaningful application | county supervisor who votes on issue even though he had a conflict of interest does not have authority to establish county policy where board of supervisors may only act by majority vote | Parrott rule applicable to due process violation occasioned by county supervisor voting in matter in which he had a conflict of interest | county supervisor who votes on issue even though he had a conflict of interest does not have authority to establish county policy where board of supervisors may only act by majority vote

Citator

Cited by
32 opinions

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.