Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Lake Nacimiento Ranch Co. v. County of San Luis Obispo
102 L. Ed. 2d 55
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1988-10-03
- Topic
- general
noting that the district court properly required nonmovant to make "sufficient showings" supporting essential elements of its case | noting that the district court properly required nonmovant to make “sufficient showings” supporting essential elements of its case | finding the submission of an "informal" draft of a development plan for comments by land use agency staff members was not a meaningful application | county supervisor who votes on issue even though he had a conflict of interest does not have authority to establish county policy where board of supervisors may only act by majority vote | Parrott rule applicable to due process violation occasioned by county supervisor voting in matter in which he had a conflict of interest | county supervisor who votes on issue even though he had a conflict of interest does not have authority to establish county policy where board of supervisors may only act by majority vote
Citator
- Cited by
- 32 opinions
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.