Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Krishnamurthy v. Nimmagadda

Krishnamurthy v. Nimmagadda, 118 S. Ct. 2328 (1998)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1998-06-15
Topic
general

noting that “[t]he purpose of allocution is to permit the defendant to speak on his [or her] own behalf or present any information in mitigation of punishment” | determining whether the relationship is fiduciary under Section 523(a)(4) is an issue of Federal law for which state law can be consulted | rejecting the notion that torture or serious physical abuse needs further definition | rejecting the notion that torture or serious physical abuse needs further definition | "[i]n a murder case, the trial court must instruct the jury on every lesser included homicide offense supported by the evidence.” | "[i]n a murder case, the trial court must instruct the jury on every lesser included homicide offense supported by the evidence." | “heinous, atrocious, or cruel” is act involving “torture or serious physical abuse beyond that necessary to produce death” [internal quotation marks omitted] | upholding the especially heinous, atrocious and cruel aggravating circumstance

Citator

Cited by
32 opinions

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.