Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Krishnamurthy v. Nimmagadda
Krishnamurthy v. Nimmagadda, 118 S. Ct. 2328 (1998)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1998-06-15
- Topic
- general
noting that “[t]he purpose of allocution is to permit the defendant to speak on his [or her] own behalf or present any information in mitigation of punishment” | determining whether the relationship is fiduciary under Section 523(a)(4) is an issue of Federal law for which state law can be consulted | rejecting the notion that torture or serious physical abuse needs further definition | rejecting the notion that torture or serious physical abuse needs further definition | "[i]n a murder case, the trial court must instruct the jury on every lesser included homicide offense supported by the evidence.” | "[i]n a murder case, the trial court must instruct the jury on every lesser included homicide offense supported by the evidence." | “heinous, atrocious, or cruel” is act involving “torture or serious physical abuse beyond that necessary to produce death” [internal quotation marks omitted] | upholding the especially heinous, atrocious and cruel aggravating circumstance
Citator
- Cited by
- 32 opinions
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.