Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Knight v. Florida

Knight v. Fla., 145 L. Ed. 2d 370 (1999)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1999-11-08
Topic
general

denying certiorari on similar issue; opinion of Stevens, J., pointing out denial is not ruling on merits | "Consistency would seem to demand that those who accept our death penalty jurisprudence as a given also accept the lengthy delay between sentencing and execution as a necessary consequence" | Thomas, J., concurring in denial of certiorari; Breyer, J., dissenting from denial of certiorari | “A growing number of courts outside the United States — courts that accept or assume the lawfulness of the death penalty — have held that lengthy delay in administering a lawful death penalty renders the ultimate execution inhuman, degrading, or unusually cruel”

Citator

Cited by
37 opinions

Sup. Ct. Fla.; and

Sup. Ct. Neb. Certio-rari denied. Reported below: No. 98-9741, 721 So. 2d 287; No. 99-5291, 256 Neb. 553, 591 N.W. 2d 86.

Opinion of Justice Stevens respecting the denial of the petitions for writ of certiorari.

It seems appropriate to emphasize that the denial of these petitions for certiorari does not constitute a ruling on the merits. See, e. g., Barber v. Tennessee, 513 U. S. 1184 (1995) (opinion of Stevens, J., respecting denial of certiorari).