Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Klapprott v. United States
69 S. Ct. 398
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1949-04-04
- Topic
- general
noting that Rule 60(b)(6) provides courts the authority “adequate to enable them to vacate judgments whenever such action is appropriate to accomplish justice” | finding that Rule 60(b)(6) enables a court to “accomplish justice” | finding that Rule 60(b)(6) enables a court to "accomplish justice" | upholding relief under Rule 60 when the government sought to denaturalize the movant-inmate after incarcerating him for multiple years, during which several of his attempts to challenge their determinations went awry | denaturalization decree entered by default more than a year previously against petitioner who could not defend himself at that time because of incarceration, poverty, and illness | motion to vacate default granted because at the time that judgment was entered, movant was ill, penniless and in jail, thus unable to appear and present his defense | party established existence of extraordinary circumstances where he was prevented from making a timely appeal of judgment for four years because of incarceration, ill health and other factors beyond his reasonable control | courts have power to “vacate judgments whenever such action is appropriate to accomplish justice.” | citizenship may not be revoked by default judgment | citizenship may not be revoked by default judgment | noting appropriate use of Rule 60(b)(6) to “accomplish justice” | default disfavored where substantial rights are involved | plurality opinion of Black, /.
Citator
- Cited by
- 91 opinions
The motion of the respondent to modify the judgment of this Court in this case is granted. The judgment announced January 17,1949 [335 U. S. 601, 616], reading as follows: “The judgments accordingly are reversed and the cause is remanded to the District Court with instructions to set aside the judgment by default and grant the petitioner a hearing on the merits raised by the denaturalization complaint.”, is amended to read: “The judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed and the cause is remanded to the District Court with directions to receive evidence on the truth or falsity of the allegations contained in petitioner's petition to vacate the default judgment entered in the denaturalization proceedings.”
Mr. Justice Black, Mr. Justice Douglas, Mr. Justice Murphy, and Mr. Justice Rutledge dissent from the modification of the order.