Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Kirkpatrick v. Hardt
Kirkpatrick v. Hardt, 303 U.S. 626 (1938)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1938-03-28
- Topic
- general
Per Curiam: The motion for leave to proceed further herein in forma pauperis is denied for the reason that the Court, upon examination of the papers herein submitted, finds that the application for writ of certiorari was not made within the time provided by law. Act of February 13, 1925, sec. 8 (a) (43 Stat. 936, 940). Finn v. Railroad Commission, 286 U. S. 559; Cresswell &c. v.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Kirkpatrick v. Hardt. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
The motion for leave to proceed further herein in forma pauperis is denied for the reason that the Court, upon examination of the papers herein submitted, finds that the application for writ of certiorari was not made within the time provided by law. Act of February 13, 1925, sec. 8 (a) (43 Stat. 936, 940). Finn v. Railroad Commission, 286 U. S. 559; Cresswell &c. v. Tillinghast, 286 U. S. 560. The petition for writ of certiorari is therefore also denied.