Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
King v. Palmer
503 U.S. 918
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1992-03-09
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- “[r]eading the tea leaves” to anticipate how the Supreme Court would rule on the issue before it
- “Heading the tea leaves” to anticipate how the Supreme Court would decide the issue under consideration
- monetary recovery against the United States under § 362(h) is not permitted, as that section does not contain any of the trigger words required by § 106(c) — "creditor,” “entity,” or “governmental unit"
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed King v. Palmer. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 28 opinions
C. A. D. C. Cir. Motion of petitioner to expedite consideration of the petition for writ of certiorari denied.
Justice Thomas took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.