Kentucky Rural Electric Cooperative Corp. v. Moloney Electric Co.

Upholding special master's conclusion of law which stated "Plaintiff ... has failed to prove ... [t]he amount of its damage from loss of profits it would have made on such additional sales of the patented composition" | Upholding special master’s conclusion of law which stated “Plaintiff ... has failed to prove ... [t]he amount of its damage from loss of profits it would have made on such additional sales of the patented composition” | held § 2(c) violation was defense to plaintiff’s claim under other sections of the Robinson-Pat-man Act | reliance on opinion of patent counsel that product is not infringing demonstrates good faith