Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Kellam v. Keith

144 U.S. 568

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1892-04-11
Topic
bankruptcy

How later courts describe this case

  • suggesting that basis for removal must exist both at time complaint is filed and at time of removal

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Kellam v. Keith. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
24 opinions
KELLAM v. KEITH,144 U.S. 568(1892)
KELLAMv. KEITH.
APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF
KANSAS.
No. 269.
Argued and submitted April 1, 1892.
Decided April 11, 1892.
On the authority ofStevensv.Nichols,130 U.S. 230,Jacksonv.Allen,132 U.S. 27, andLa ConfianceCompagniev.Hall,137 U.S. 61, the decree below in this case is reversed and the cause remanded with directions toPage 569remand it to the Circuit Court, it not appearing in the record that the diverse citizenship which was the cause of removal from the State Court existed at the commencement of the action. In such case the appellees are entitled to their costs in this court and in the Circuit Court.
THIS was a suit for the cancellation of a deed, and to compel a reconveyance of land, commenced in the District Court of Shawnee County in the State of Kansas. The complaint did not disclose the citizenship of the parties. The defendants, before pleading, presented a petition as follows for the removal of the cause to the Circuit Court of the United States:

"And now come the said defendants Edward P. Kellam and Cyrus K. Holiday, by Rossington, Smith Dallas and John T. Morton, their attorneys, and represent and aver that in this action the matter in dispute exceeds, exclusive of costs and interest, the sum and value of five hundred dollars, and in fact exceeds, exclusive of interest and costs, the sum of two thousand dollars, and that in this suit there is a controversy which is wholly between citizens of different States, the said plaintiff being a citizen of the State of Nebraska and both of said defendants being citizens of the State of Kansas, and that the controversy can be fully determined as between them, the said plaintiff and said defendants.

"These defendants therefore ask that this cause be removed into the Circuit Court of the United States in and for the District of Kansas to be held in said district; that this court accept this petition and the bond herewith filed and proceed no further in this action, and that this cause be removed into said Circuit Court."

After removal the Circuit Court ordered the pleadings to be recast, whereupon the plaintiff filed a bill in equity in which the parties were described as follows: "Morrell C. Keith, of North Platte, Nebraska, and a citizen of the State of Nebraska, brings this his bill against Edward P. Kellam, of Topeka, and a citizen of the State of Kansas, and Cyrus K. Holliday, of Topeka, and a citizen of the State of Kansas; and thereupon your orator complains and says, etc."Page 570

The case then proceeded to judgment, and, a decree for the plaintiff being rendered, the defendants appealed to this court.
Mr. W.H. Rossington, Mr. Charles Blood Smith, Mr. Everett J.DallasandMr. John T. Morton, for appellants, submitted on their brief.Mr. E.S. Quintonfor appellee.Mr. A.B. QuintonandMr.A. Bergenwere with him on the brief.
THE CHIEF JUSTICE:
Upon the authority ofStevensv.Nichols,130 U.S. 230;Jacksonv.Allen,132 U.S. 27;La Confiance Compagniev.Hall,137 U.S. 61, and other cases, the decree in this case must be reversed, at the costs of appellants in this court and in the Circuit Court, and the cause remanded to the Circuit Court with directions to remand it to the state court.