Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Kaufman v. Societe Internationale pour Participations Industrielles et Commerciales, S. A.
Kaufman v. Societe Internationale pour Participations Industrielles et Commerciales, S. A., 342 U.S. 847 (1951)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1951-10-15
- Topic
- commercial
United States Court of Appeals *848for the District of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari granted. William Radner, Odell Kominers and Henry G. Fischer for petitioners in No. 172. Thurman Arnold, Edward J.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Kaufman v. Societe Internationale pour Participations Industrielles et Commerciales, S. A.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
United States Court of Appeals
*848
for the District of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari granted.
William Radner, Odell Kominers and
Henry G. Fischer for petitioners in No. 172.
Thurman Arnold, Edward J. Ennis and
Harry M. Plotkin for petitioner in No. 178.
Solicitor General Perl-man, Assistant Attorney General Baynton and
George B. Searls for McGrath et al., respondents in No. 172 and McGrath, respondent in No. 178, and with them were
David Schwartz and
Sidney B. Jacoby in No. 172 and
James L. Morrisson, Myron C. Baum and
Joseph Laufer in No. 178.
Roger J. Whiteford and
John J. Wilson for Societe Internationale pour Participations Industrielles et Commerciales, S. A.; and
William P. MacCracken, Jr'., Urban A. Lavery and
William W. Barron for Remington Rand, Inc., respondents in No. 172. Mr. Justice Clark took no part in the consideration or decision of these applications.