Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Kaplus v. Phillips

88 L. Ed. 2d 778

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1986-01-13
Topic
general

setting forth the basic tenets of Illinois law regarding the construction of contracts | "[T]he congressional purpose of uniformity and simplicity in trademark laws could be furthered only if attorneys' fees were recoverable under section 43(a)." | attorneys’ fees recoverable in “exceptional cases” where section 43(a) of the Lanham Act is violated. | “[T]he congressional purpose of uniformity and simplicity in trademark laws could be furthered only if attorneys’ fees were recoverable under section 43(a).” | "the grant or denial of either a motion for a new trial or a motion to amend the judgment must be reviewed on the basis of a determination of whether the district court abused its discretion." | “Moreover, under federal law, actions for accounting have traditionally been considered equitable.” [citations omitted] | “the grant or denial of either a motion for a new trial or a motion to amend the judgment must be reviewed on the basis of a determination of whether the district court abused its discretion.” | registration by Copyright Office constitutes prima facie evidence of copyrightability | registration by Copyright Office constitutes prima facie evidence of copy-rightability | sales in excess of $5 million

Citator

Cited by
108 opinions

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.