Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Jones v. Texas
Jones v. Tex., 507 U.S. 921 (1993)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1993-02-22
- Topic
- general
stating “[i]t is well settled that, in determining the sufficiency of an affidavit for an arrest or search warrant, a reviewing court is limited to the ‘four corners of an affidavit’ ” | stating “[i]t is well settled that, in determining the sufficiency of an affidavit for an arrest or search warrant, a reviewing court is limited to the ‘four corners of an affidavit’” | stating “[i]t is well settled that, in determining the sufficiency of an affidavit for an arrest or search warrant, a reviewing court is limited to the ‘four corners of an affidavit’” | stating "[i]t is well settled that, in determining the sufficiency of an affidavit for an arrest or search warrant, a reviewing court is limited to the 'four corners of an affidavit'" | trial court's evidentiary ruling should not be disturbed on appeal if correct on any theory of "law applicable to the case" | trial court’s evi-dentiary ruling should not be disturbed on appeal if correct on any theory of "law applicable to the case”
Citator
- Cited by
- 36 opinions
Ct. Crim. App. Tex. Certiorari denied.