Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Jones v. Texas

Jones v. Tex., 507 U.S. 921 (1993)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1993-02-22
Topic
general

stating “[i]t is well settled that, in determining the sufficiency of an affidavit for an arrest or search warrant, a reviewing court is limited to the ‘four corners of an affidavit’ ” | stating “[i]t is well settled that, in determining the sufficiency of an affidavit for an arrest or search warrant, a reviewing court is limited to the ‘four corners of an affidavit’” | stating “[i]t is well settled that, in determining the sufficiency of an affidavit for an arrest or search warrant, a reviewing court is limited to the ‘four corners of an affidavit’” | stating "[i]t is well settled that, in determining the sufficiency of an affidavit for an arrest or search warrant, a reviewing court is limited to the 'four corners of an affidavit'" | trial court's evidentiary ruling should not be disturbed on appeal if correct on any theory of "law applicable to the case" | trial court’s evi-dentiary ruling should not be disturbed on appeal if correct on any theory of "law applicable to the case”

Citator

Cited by
36 opinions

Ct. Crim. App. Tex. Certiorari denied.