Jones v. New York City Human Resources Administration

stating in dictum that irregularities must infect the proceedings of the grand jury, deprive defendants of a fundamental right or violate the paramount policy of the United States | when the trial is "impeccably fair and just" an erroneous failure to recuse is harmless error | when the trial is “impeccably fair and just” an erroneous failure to recuse is harmless error | to obtain a hearing, “the petition must be accompanied by a detailed and specific affidavit” | “[i]t is not necessary for us ... to*agree with plaintiff’s interpretation [of the ‘sole and exclusive benefit’ of the employees requirement of Section 302(c)(5 | “Thus, the petition [2255] that was employed to support the claim that petitioners were entitled to a hearing was essentially predicated on conjecture and speculation”