Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Jet Industries, Inc. v. United States

476 U.S. 1115

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1986-05-19
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • "We conclude that the selection and supervision of participants in the Federal Witness Protection Program constitute discretionary functions."
  • government’s failure to warn plaintiff of the risk of doing business with a federal probationer and protected witness was discretionary

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Jet Industries, Inc. v. United States. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
29 opinions

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.