Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Jansen v. United States

414 U.S. 826

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1973-10-09
Topic
general

noting that the Government has standing to sue when a pattern or practice exists | policy of leniency following guilty plea properly held by the trial court to be inapplicable to situation where defendant puts government to its proof in full trial | policy of leniency following guilty plea properly held by the trial court to be inapplicable to situation where defendant puts government to its proof in full trial | policy of leniency following guilty plea properly held by trial court to be inapplicable to situation where defendant puts government to its proof in full trial | policy of leniency following guilty plea properly held by trial court to be inapplicable to situation where defendant puts government to its proof in full trial | “The District Court correctly exercised its discretion to issue an injunction properly tailored so as to keep interference with [defendant real estate broker’s] business at a minimum compatible with full compliance with the law.” | “ ‘[The words “for profit”] ... were evidently included in § 3604(e | court could not find that publicity prejudiced jury where district court asked jurors whether any of them had seen the article and there was no evidence that more than one juror had read it; court will not assume each juror purposely lied

Citator

Cited by
52 opinions

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.