Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Jackson v. United States
531 U.S. 953
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 2000-10-30
- Topic
- bankruptcy
How later courts describe this case
- holding defense counsel’s absence did not constitute “abandonment by the lawyer of his client,” which “would require reversal irrespective of prejudice,” because counsel for co-defendants were present and generally protected the defendant’s interests
- remanding to United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit for “further consideration in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey ”
- upholding a wiretap order where k judge for the Northern District of Illinois authorized the interception of calls made and received in the Southern District of Illinois
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Jackson v. United States. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 19 opinions
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari as to Harold Jackson granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U. S. 466 (2000). Certiorari as to Kevin Williams, Dion Lewis, Jathel Garrett, Derrick Mallett, Richard Wash, Scott Davis, James Doty, Michelle Gaines, Clarence Haywood, Cedric Parks, and James Yates denied.