Jackson v. United States

affirming JNOV for defendant since there was qualitative difference between younger employee's letter writing to superior and plaintiff's disparaging remarks about company | affirming JNOV for defendant since there was qualitative difference between younger employee’s letter writing to superior and plaintiffs disparaging remarks about company | affirming the District Court’s grant of judgment notwithstanding the verdict for failure to demonstrate pretext | “in the interest of judicial economy res judicata may properly be raised by a district court sua sponte ” | beneficiary of trust that sold securities had standing under Rule 10b-5 because representations made directly to beneficiary, who had right to approve sale and experienced direct impact of transaction | insignificant that majority of managers terminated were in protected group because majority of managers employed were in protected group | beneficiary of trust that sold securities had standing under Rule 10b-5 because representations made directly to beneficiary, who had right to approve sale and experienced direct impact of transaction | claims for retaliatory discrimination for filing FELA claim are without jurisdiction of Federal Courts | claim of retaliatory discharge for violating an FELA suit