Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Interstate Investors, Inc. v. United States
393 U.S. 479
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1969-01-27
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- "The dominant Congressional purpose in enacting (section 20a) was to protect investors in the securities of railroads . . . ."
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Interstate Investors, Inc. v. United States. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 23 opinions
393 U.S. 479 (1969)
INTERSTATE INVESTORS, INC.
No. 755.
INTERSTATE INVESTORS, INC.
v.
UNITED STATES ET AL.
No. 755.
Supreme Court of United States.
Decided January 27, 1969. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK.Frederick W. P. Lorenzen and William R. Burt for appellant.
Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Zimmerman, Howard E. Shapiro, Robert W. Ginnane, and Jerome Nelson for the United States et al., and Thomas F. Daly, John W. Castles III, and Warren A. Goff for Transcontinental Bus System, Inc., appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.