Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

International Union, United Mine Workers v. A. T. Massey Coal Co.

95 L. Ed. 2d 536

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1987-04-27
Topic
general

holding that a plaintiff must allege a breach of an existing collective bargaining agreement in order to avail itself of jurisdiction under § 301 | holding that a plaintiff must allege a breach of an existing collective bargaining agreement in order to avail itself of jurisdiction under Sec. 301 | noting that "[t]he manner, the motivation, and other attendant circumstances of the offense are the type of considerations which may augment the value of this aggravating circumstance." | noting that “[t]he manner, the motivation, and other attendant circumstances of the offense are the type of considerations which may augment the value of this aggravating circumstance.” | finding federal district court jurisdiction under Sec. 301 in a declaratory judgment action seeking a determination that a parent corporation and its affiliated companies were bound by an existing collective bargaining agreement | finding federal district court jurisdiction under § 301 in a declaratory judgment action seeking a determination that a parent corporation and its affiliated companies were bound by an existing collective bargaining agreement | “Can’t we wait until tomorrow” constitutes equivocal indication of right to cut off questioning

Citator

Cited by
30 opinions

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Justice Powell took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.