International Union, United Mine Workers v. A. T. Massey Coal Co.

How later courts describe this case

• holding that a plaintiff must allege a breach of an existing collective bargaining agreement in order to avail itself of jurisdiction under § 301
• holding that a plaintiff must allege a breach of an existing collective bargaining agreement in order to avail itself of jurisdiction under Sec. 301
• noting that "[t]he manner, the motivation, and other attendant circumstances of the offense are the type of considerations which may augment the value of this aggravating circumstance."
• finding federal district court jurisdiction under Sec. 301 in a declaratory judgment action seeking a determination that a parent corporation and its affiliated companies were bound by an existing collective bargaining agreement
• finding federal district court jurisdiction under § 301 in a declaratory judgment action seeking a determination that a parent corporation and its affiliated companies were bound by an existing collective bargaining agreement
• “Can’t we wait until tomorrow” constitutes equivocal indication of right to cut off questioning