Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

International Textbook Co. v. Peterson

218 U.S. 664

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1910-11-07
Topic
general

Per Curiam: Substantially the same question of Federal law involved in these two cases arose under a Kansas statute in International Textbook Co. v. Pigg, 217 U. S. 91; and the Federal right asserted in that case was sustained. There is no difference in principle between the two cases last named and the Pigg case, although the Federal question involved in them, arises under the statutes, respectively, of other States — Wisconsin and Vermont. In view of the pleadings and the conceded facts in these cases the judgment in each of them must be reversed on the authority , of the Pigg case, and the cases are severally remanded for such further proceedings as is required by and is not inconsistent with this opinion.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed International Textbook Co. v. Peterson. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
1 opinion
INTERNATIONAL TEXTBOOK CO.v. PETERSON,218 U.S. 664(1910)
31 S.Ct. 225
INTERNATIONAL TEXTBOOK COMPANYv. PETERSON.
SAMEv. LYNCH.
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WISCONSIN.
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF VERMONT.
Nos. 3, 27.
Submitted October 24, 1910.
Decided November 7, 1910.
Submitted November 2, 1910.
Decided November 7, 1910.
Decided on authority ofInternational Textbook Co. v.Pigg,217 U.S. 91.
Mr. David C. Harringtonfor plaintiff in error.

No briefs filed for defendants in error.
Per Curiam:
Substantially the same question of Federal law involved in these two cases arose under a Kansas statute inInternational Textbook Co. v.Pigg,217 U.S. 91; and the Federal right asserted in that case was sustained. There is no difference in principle between the two cases last named and thePigg case, although the Federal question involved in them arises under the statutes, respectively, of other States — Wisconsin and Vermont. In view of the pleadings and the conceded facts in these cases the judgment in each of them must be reversed on the authority of thePigg case, and the cases are severally remanded for such further proceedings as is required by and is not inconsistent with this opinion.It is so ordered.Page 1