Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

In re Union Leader Corp.

7 L. Ed. 2d 190

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1961-12-04
Topic
general

arbitrator’s remedy to be upheld in the absence of “clearly restrictive language” in the arbitration agreement | 'Chenery applies only to “determinations specifically entrusted to an agency’s expertise,” not “legal principles” of the sort “that a court usually makes” | whether or not trial court was correct in its conclusion that a party had engaged in misconduct, the court’s view was not unwarranted and did not indicate personal bias or prejudice | claim of bias of trial judge was sufficiently meritorious to warrant consideration upon petition for writ of mandamus; public confidence in courts and proper administration of justice required that question be disposed of at earliest opportunity | claim of bias of trial judge was sufficiently meritorious to warrant consideration upon petition for writ of mandamus; public confidence in courts and proper administration of justice required that question be disposed of at earliest opportunity | Letter to receiver who subsequently became the trustee | reviewing the legislative history of the three-creditor requirement

Citator

Cited by
76 opinions

C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.