Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
In re Ruffalo
392 U.S. 919
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1968-06-17
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- attorney disciplinary actions are “adversary proceedings of a quasi-criminal nature” and the attorney subject to discipline is entitled to due process of law
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed In re Ruffalo. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 8 opinions
390 U. S. 544, 391 U. S. 961. The judgment heretofore issued in this case on May 28, 1968, is amended to omit the provision therein taxing costs in favor of petitioner against the Ohio State and Mahoning County Bar Associations.
Mr. Justice Stewart took no part in the consideration or decision of this order.