Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
In re Gillispie
499 U.S. 918
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1991-03-18
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- explaining that Eighth Amendment requires meaningful appellate review to ensure that death penalty is not imposed arbitrarily or irrationally
- trial court erred under predecessor to Rule 52, in precluding appellant from making offer of proof as to testimony excluded during pre-trial hearing on appellant’s motion to dismiss indictment
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed In re Gillispie. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 41 opinions
Petition for writ of prohibition denied.