Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

In re Garringer

513 U.S. 826

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1994-10-03
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • “Unwarranted public suggestion by an attorney that a judicial officer is motivated by criminal purposes and considerations does nothing but weaken and erode the public’s confidence in an impartial adjudicatory process” and is prejudicial to the administration of justice.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed In re Garringer. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
2 opinions

Sup. Ct. Ind. Certiorari denied.