Imperial Meat Co. v. United States

holding that the theft from “wooden pallets” rather than from wharf was within the statutory compass and any other interpretation would frustrate the intention of Congress | plaintiff must show “that his claimed injury stemmed directly and proximately from the same type of practice condemned in the prior Government action” | the proposed area "was a practical homogeneous territory of control, fairly encompassing the Baltimore milkshed" | normal swells from passing ship overturns precarious derrick engaged in lifting constitute peril of sea | a duty of good faith in terminating a contract with an "at will” termination clause exists only where a statute imposes that specific duty notwithstanding the clause | the proposed area “was a practical homogeneous territory of control, fairly encompassing the Baltimore milkshed” | no inconsistency in jury’s answers to interrogatories that defendant had a general monopoly in the shoe industry but not a monopoly in a particular portion of the shoe industry