Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Hudson & Manhattan R. v. Cahill

Hudson & Manhattan R. v. Cahill, 307 U.S. 640 (1939)

Type: Opinion
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1939-05-29
Topic: general

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit *641denied.' Mr. William D. Whitney for petitioner. Solicitor General Jackson, Assistant Attorney General Arnold, and Messrs. Robert L.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Hudson & Manhattan R. v. Cahill. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 2 opinions

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit *641 denied.'

Mr. William D. Whitney for petitioner. Solicitor General Jackson, Assistant Attorney General Arnold, and Messrs. Robert L. Stern, Charles A. Horsky, .and Daniel W. Knowlton for Cahill et. al., respondents. Messrs. Ezra Brainerd, Jr. and Alex. M. Bull for the Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers et al., intervening-respondents.