Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Hotel Employees Local No. 255 v. Leedom

358 U.S. 99

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1958-11-24
Topic
general

Per Curiam. We believe that dismissal of the representation petition on the sole ground of the Board’s "long standing policy not to exercise jurisdiction over the hotel industry” as a class, is contrary to the principles expressed in Office Employes v. Labor Board, 353 U. S. 313, 318-320 (1957). The judgment is therefore reversed and the case remanded to the Court of Appeals for proceedings not inconsistent herewith.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Hotel Employees Local No. 255 v. Leedom. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
46 opinions
Per Curiam.

We believe that dismissal of the representation petition on the sole ground of the Board’s "long standing policy not to exercise jurisdiction over the hotel industry” as a class, is contrary to the principles expressed in Office Employes v. Labor Board, 353 U. S. 313, 318-320 (1957). The judgment is therefore reversed and the case remanded to the Court of Appeals for proceedings not inconsistent herewith.