Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Hoover v. Ronwin
Hoover v. Ronwin, 461 U.S. 926 (1983)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1983-05-16
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- payments to funds under non-enforceable “prehire” agreements would not be illegal themselves, as would payments under the “purchased coal clause” in Kaiser Steel
- The court held in the context of challenged action by the state supreme court-appointed committee which grades the Arizona bar examination that the acts of this governmental body had to be "actively supervised by the state itself" in order to be immune from Sherman Act scrutiny.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Hoover v. Ronwin. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 28 opinions
C. A. 9th Cir. Motion of National Conference of Bar Examiners for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae granted. Certiorari granted.
Justice O’Connor took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and this petition.