Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Holmes v. United States

314 U.S. 583

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1941-12-08
Topic
general

Per Curiam: The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. On the Government’s consent, the petition for a writ of certiorari is granted, the judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded to the Circuit Court of Appeals with instructions to enter an order affording reasonable opportunity for the preparation, presentation, settling, and filing of a suitable bill of exceptions, and with permission to the court to hear argument and redetermine the case insofar as that course may be required if such a bill is filed, or to take such further proceedings and enter such further orders as may seem appropriate if no adequate bill can be settled. Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the *584consideration and decision of this case. Leo S.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Holmes v. United States. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
4 opinions
Per Curiam:

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. On the Government’s consent, the petition for a writ of certiorari is granted, the judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded to the Circuit Court of Appeals with instructions to enter an order affording reasonable opportunity for the preparation, presentation, settling, and filing of a suitable bill of exceptions, and with permission to the court to hear argument and redetermine the case insofar as that course may be required if such a bill is filed, or to take such further proceedings and enter such further orders as may seem appropriate if no adequate bill can be settled.

Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the *584 consideration and decision of this case. Leo S. Holmes, pro se. Solicitor General Fahy, Assistant Attorney General Berge, and Messrs. Oscar A. Provost and W. Marvin Smith for the United States.