Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Hitchcock v. Collenberg
Hitchcock v. Collenberg, 353 U.S. 919 (1957)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1957-04-01
- Topic
- general
Per Curiam: The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. Taylor v. Oklahoma ex rel. Rutherford, 352 U. S. 805; Dantzler v.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Hitchcock v. Collenberg. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 8 opinions
Per Curiam:
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. Taylor v. Oklahoma ex rel. Rutherford, 352 U. S. 805; Dantzler v. Callison, 352 U. S. 939; Dent v. West Virginia, 129 U. S. 114.