Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Herrmann v. Rogers
358 U.S. 332
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1959-01-26
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- limiting the appellate court’s review on remand to a finite issue of Idaho property law
- disturbing divine worship by loud talking, shouting and sitting on the floor of church
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Herrmann v. Rogers. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 11 opinions
Per Curiam.
The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is vacated, and the cause is remanded to it, to consider whether, under the law of property of Idaho, it was possible, after the time of the making of the conveyance, for any person other than the named beneficiaries of the trust to acquire a property interest in it (other than through a named beneficiary), and, in the light of its determination as to this, to reconsider its holding that respondent was entitled to all the trust funds remaining in the hands of the trustee.