Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Helvering v. Duke
290 U.S. 591
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1933-10-23
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- affirmed by an equally divided Court
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Helvering v. Duke. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 13 opinions
Per Curiam:
*592
tice Hughes took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. Solicitor General Biggs and Mr. Erwin N. Griswold, with whom Messrs. Sewall Key and Francis H. Horan were on the brief, for petitioner. Mr. John W. Davis, with whom Messrs. Wm. R. Perkins, Forrest Hyde, H. H. Shelton,., and Marion N. Fisher were on the brief, for respondents.
Decree affirmed by an equally divided Court.
Mr. Chief Jus