Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Heard v. Rizzo
392 U.S. 646
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1968-06-17
- Topic
- litigation
How later courts describe this case
- words “loud and unseemly” in statute not unconstitutionally vague
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Heard v. Rizzo. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 10 opinions
392 U.S. 646 (1968)
HEARD ET AL.
No. 1530, Misc.
HEARD ET AL.
v.
RIZZO ET AL.
No. 1530, Misc.
Supreme Court of United States.
Decided June 17, 1968.[*] APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA.Lois G. Forer for appellants in No. 1530, Misc. William Kunstler for appellants in No. 1662, Misc.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgments are affirmed.
NOTES
[*] Together with No. 1662, Misc., Traylor et al. v. Rizzo et al., also on appeal from the same court.