Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Healy v. Ratta
289 U.S. 701
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1933-03-20
- Topic
- general
Per Curiam: The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of jurisdiction, as it appears from the supplemental record and was admitted at the bar that the application for interlocutory injunction was not pressed but was waived, and there is therefore no ground for an appeal to this Court. Smith v. Wilson, 273 U.S. 388, 391; Stratton v. St. Louis Southwestern Ry.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Healy v. Ratta. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 15 opinions
The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of jurisdiction, as it appears from the supplemental record and was admitted at the bar that the application for interlocutory injunction was not pressed but was waived, and there is therefore no ground for an appeal to this Court. Smith v. Wilson, 273 U.S. 388, 391; Stratton v. St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co., 282 U.S. 10, 15.