Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Hayes v. Community General Osteopathic Hospital

Hayes v. Cmty. Gen. Osteopathic Hosp., 117 L. Ed. 2d 110 (1992)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1992-01-21
Topic
general

noting that the exercise of supplemental jurisdiction over state law claims is not automatic, but “is a favored and normal course of action.” | noting eases ruling that social security benefits should not be set off from ADEA lost wages award, although not reaching the issue | all individuals must pay federal income tax on their wages, regardless of whether they have requested, obtained or exercised any privilege from the federal government | enactment of various construction mora-toria, though it amounted to spot zoning, was protected by absolute immunity | In an ADEA claim “[a] federal court’s exercise of pendent jurisdiction over plaintiffs state law claims, while not automatic, is a favored and normal course of action.” | affirming denial of summary judgment on qualified immunity grounds | affirm-ing denial of summary judgment on qualified immunity grounds | jury acted in advisory capacity only

Citator

Cited by
52 opinions

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.