Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Hayes v. Community General Osteopathic Hospital
Hayes v. Cmty. Gen. Osteopathic Hosp., 117 L. Ed. 2d 110 (1992)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1992-01-21
- Topic
- general
noting that the exercise of supplemental jurisdiction over state law claims is not automatic, but “is a favored and normal course of action.” | noting eases ruling that social security benefits should not be set off from ADEA lost wages award, although not reaching the issue | all individuals must pay federal income tax on their wages, regardless of whether they have requested, obtained or exercised any privilege from the federal government | enactment of various construction mora-toria, though it amounted to spot zoning, was protected by absolute immunity | In an ADEA claim “[a] federal court’s exercise of pendent jurisdiction over plaintiffs state law claims, while not automatic, is a favored and normal course of action.” | affirming denial of summary judgment on qualified immunity grounds | affirm-ing denial of summary judgment on qualified immunity grounds | jury acted in advisory capacity only
Citator
- Cited by
- 52 opinions
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.