Haskins v. United States

some defendants deeply involved in narcotics conspiracy and aware of its scope while others were not | “ . . . [I]t [is] the conspiracy that in some instances must be inferred largely from the series of criminal offenses committed.” | "Such a reading of the savings clause is consistent with the rule that savings clauses are to be broadly construed." | “Such a reading of the savings clause is consistent with the rule that savings clauses are to be broadly construed.” | primary jurisdiction not necessary where agency had participated extensively in litigation | four week trial involving fourteen defendants and eleven counts; violations of federal narcotics laws | primary jurisdiction not necessary where agency had participated extensively in litigation | litigant who absconds forfeits right to have appeal adjudicated