Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board
Hartford Accident & Indem. Co. v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd., 506 U.S. 957 (1992)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1992-11-02
- Topic
- employee-benefits-and-executive-compensation
How later courts describe this case
- holding Texas special issues need not be accompanied by instructions in order for jury to adequately consider accused’s troubled childhood and his emotional turmoil at the time of offense
- informant’s use of cocaine on several occasions with defendant not outrageous government conduct even if government had directed the conduct
- two misdemeanor convictions for assault sufficient to negate this mitigating circumstance
- "A federal evidentiary hearing on a constitutional claim must be held only where the state court has not provided a hearing, where the petitioner alleges facts which, if proved, would entitle him to relief, and where the record reveals a genuine factual dispute.”
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Authority status
- pending
- Cited by
- 82 opinions
Ct. App. Cal., 4th App. Dist. Certiorari denied.