Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Harris v. Ross

439 U.S. 1001

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1978-12-04
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • Congress did not intend to give the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development the discretion to decline to spend any of the money targeted for the operating subsidy program.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Harris v. Ross. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
11 opinions

C. A. 4th Cir.; and

C. A. 9th Cir. [Cer-tiorari granted, 431 U. S. 928.] Motion of the Solicitor General, with consent of respondents, for reference to the United States District Court for the District of Maryland [in No. 76-1234], and for reference to the United States District Court for the Central District of California [in No. 76-1261], to consider settlement granted.