holding that appellant, who had been tried and convicted of felony murder, could not be subsequently tried under a separate indictment for the predicate felony | holding that a defendant previously convicted of felony murder during a robbery could not then be tried for the robbery | holding that a defendant previously convicted of felony murder during a robbery could not then be tried for the robbery | holding that, for double jeopardy purposes, robbery with a firearm is the same offense as felony murder predicated on armed robbery | holding that appellant, who had been tried and convicted of felony murder, could not be subsequently tried under a separate indictment for the predicate felony | holding that, for double jeopardy purposes, robbery with a firearm is the same offense as felony murder predicated on armed robbery | holding that when one defendant was convicted of felony murder based on his co-defendant’s killing of a victim during the course of an armed robbery, the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment barred a separate prosecution of the defendant for the lesser crime of armed robbery | holding that when one defendant was convicted of felony murder based on his codefendant's killing of a victim during the course of an armed robbery, the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment barred a separate prosecution of the defendant for the lesser crime of armed robbery | holding Double Jeopardy Clause prevents prosecution for underlying felony after conviction of felony murder | holding Double Jeopardy Clause prevents prosecution for underlying felony after conviction of felony murder | holding double jeopardy violated by convictions for felony murder and underlying crime | holding double jeopardy violated by convictions for felony murder and underlying crime | noting that the Double Jeopardy Clause treats offenses as one “[w]hen, as here, conviction of a greater crime . . . cannot be had without conviction of the lesser crime” | Barring felony murder and robbery with a firearm prosecution stemming from the same grocery store robbery | underlying felony and felony murder merge into one offense for purposes of double jeopardy in Oklahoma | underlying felony and felony murder merge into one offense for purposes of double jeopardy in Oklahoma | finding robbery a lesser-included offense when felony murder conviction required proof of robbery | finding robbery a lesser-included offense when felony murder conviction required proof of robbery | defendant cannot be subjected to multiple prosecutions for felony murder and robbery with firearms where the felony underlying the felony-murder charge was robbery with firearms | defendant cannot be subjected to multiple prosecutions for felony murder and robbery with firearms where the felony underlying the felony-murder charge was robbery with firearms | prosecution for robbery barred by Double Jeopardy Clause when the defendant had already been convicted of felony murder based on the same robbery | prosecution for robbery barred by Double Jeopardy Clause when the defendant had already been convicted of felony murder based on the same robbery | Court rules that felony-murder and the underlying felony are the same offense under the Blockburger test | to obtain a conviction for felony murder, State was required to prove “all the ingredients” of the underlying felony of robbery with firearms | conviction of a greater offense bars subsequent trial for a lesser included offense | "When, as here, conviction of a greater crime, murder, cannot be had without conviction of the lesser crime, robbery with firearms, the Double Jeopardy Clause bars prosecution for the lesser crime after conviction of the greater one" | “When, as here, conviction of a greater crime, murder, cannot be had without conviction of the lesser crime, robbery with firearms, the Double Jeopardy Clause bars prosecution for the lesser crime after conviction of the greater one” | where the initial jeopardy for felony-