Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Harris v. Fuerst
451 U.S. 965
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1981-05-04
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- explaining that “[t]his court has consistently held that the scope of these two provisions is the same”
- the active-passive indemnity rule relieves a passively negligent tortfeasor "from any liability for the damage that occurred. That result seems strongly at odds with the preferences for comparative fault expressed in Reliable Transfer "
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Harris v. Fuerst. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Authority status
- pending
- Cited by
- 24 opinions
Appeal from Sup. Ct. Ohio dismissed for want of substantial federal question.